Typographic Expression in Digital Media Bridging Readability and Emotion in Multilingual Designs
Keywords:
Digital media, Multilingual design, Readability, Typographic expression, User perceptionAbstract
In the rapidly evolving realm of digital communication, typography serves not only as a medium for conveying information but also as an expressive tool that bridges readability and emotional resonance. This study explores typographic expression in multilingual digital media, aiming to identify design strategies that enhance both legibility and affective impact across linguistic contexts. Employing a qualitative approach, the research analyzes case studies of contemporary digital platforms and conducts user testing with participants from diverse language backgrounds. The findings reveal that typeface selection, spacing, and typographic hierarchy significantly influence users' emotional perception and reading efficiency. Furthermore, the interplay between script-specific features and universal design principles emerges as a key factor in achieving balanced communication. The study concludes by proposing a framework for typographic design that harmonizes aesthetic sensibility with functional clarity, particularly in multilingual digital environments. These insights are intended to inform designers, developers, and researchers aiming to craft emotionally engaging yet readable digital interfaces for global audiences.
References
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Bringhurst, R. (2013). The elements of typographic style (4th ed.). Hartley & Marks.
Cheng, K. (2006). Designing type. Yale University Press.
Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Krippendorff, K. (2018). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Lavie, T., & Tractinsky, N. (2004). Assessing dimensions of perceived visual aesthetics of web sites. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 60(3), 269–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2003.09.002
Michailidou, E., Harper, S., & Bechhofer, S. (2008). Visual complexity and aesthetic perception of web pages. Proceedings of the 26th Annual ACM International Conference on Design of Communication, 215–224. https://doi.org/10.1145/1456536.1456580
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Norman, D. A. (2004). Emotional design: Why we love (or hate) everyday things. Basic Books.
Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Quesenbery, W., & Szuc, D. (2012). Global UX: Design and research in a connected world. Morgan Kaufmann.
Tinker, M. A. (1963). Legibility of print. Iowa State University Press.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Proceeding of the International Conference on Art, Design, and Visual Communication

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.